[1]左 磊,梅新宇,吴汉然.术前颈部淋巴结超声评估食管癌选择性三野清扫术的价值[J].医学信息,2021,34(14):87-91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.14.024]
　ZUO Lei,MEI Xin-yu,WU Han-ran.The Value of Preoperative Cervical Lymph Node Ultrasonography in Evaluating the Value of Selective Three-field Dissection for Esophageal Cancer[J].Medical Information,2021,34(14):87-91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.14.024]
点击复制

术前颈部淋巴结超声评估食管癌选择性三野清扫术的价值()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
34卷
期数:
2021年14期
页码:
87-91
栏目:
论著
出版日期:
2021-07-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Value of Preoperative Cervical Lymph Node Ultrasonography in Evaluating the Value of Selective Three-field Dissection for Esophageal Cancer
文章编号:
1006-1959（2021）14-0087-05
作者:
左 磊; 梅新宇; 吴汉然
（安徽医科大学附属安徽省立医院胸外科，安徽 合肥 230001）
Author(s):
ZUO Lei; MEI Xin-yu; WU Han-ran
(Department of Thoracic Surgery,Anhui Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230001,Anhui,China)
关键词:
食管鳞癌; 颈部淋巴结; 彩色多普勒超声
Keywords:
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Cervical lymph nodes; Color Doppler ultrasound
分类号:
R735.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.14.024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探讨术前颈部淋巴结超声评估食管癌选择性三野淋巴结清扫术的价值。方法 回顾性分析2018年1月~2019年9月我院收治的60例彩超发现颈部淋巴结的食管鳞癌手术患者临床资料，根据颈部淋巴结病理结果分为阳性组（n=28）和阴性组（n=32），比较两组一般资料及淋巴结彩超特征，并采用多因素Logistic回归分析颈部淋巴结转移的预测因素，ROC曲线分析彩超参数评估淋巴结的诊断效能。结果 阳性组和阴性组肿瘤位置、右喉返神经旁淋巴结病理以及pN分期比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），而两组年龄、性别、肿瘤浸润深度（T分期）以及分化程度（G分期）方面比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；阳性组和阴性组淋巴结长径、淋巴结短径、LAR以及血流类型比较，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），而两组的淋巴结回声类型、边界、皮质增厚、皮髓质分界、淋巴门结构比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析显示，右喉返淋巴结病理和短径是颈部淋巴结转移的独立因子。ROC曲线分析显示，淋巴结短径的AUC为0.866，淋巴结长径的AUC为0.762，LAR的AUC为0.780，截断值中短径为6.5 mm，长径为11.5 mm，LAR为0.7；且以短径＞6.5 mm诊断淋巴结转移的准确率最高，达到80%，其次为短径联合LAR，而短径联合LAR诊断的特异性最高。结论 术前颈部淋巴结超声在食管癌选择性三野淋巴结清扫术中具有较好的评估效率，可作为食管癌三野清扫术前评估的常规检查。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the value of preoperative cervical lymph node ultrasound in the evaluation of selective three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer.Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 60 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had cervical lymph nodes detected by color Doppler ultrasound admitted to our hospital from January 2018 to September 2019.According to the pathological results of cervical lymph nodes, they were divided into positive group (n=28) and negative group (n=32). The general data and lymph node color ultrasound characteristics of the two groups were compared, and multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the predictive factors of cervical lymph node metastasis.ROC curve analysis color Doppler ultrasound parameters to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of lymph nodes.Results There was a statistically significant difference in tumor location, right recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node pathology, and pN staging comparison between the positive group and the negative group (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, gender, depth of tumor invasion (T stage) and degree of differentiation (G stage) (P>0.05);There was a statistically significant difference between the long diameter of the lymph node, the short diameter of the lymph node, the LAR, and the blood flow type between the positive group and the negative group (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of lymph node echo types, borders, cortical thickening, cortical and medullary boundaries, and lymphatic hilum structure (P>0.05).Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the pathology of the right recurrent laryngeal lymph node and short diameter were independent factor.ROC curve analysis showed that the AUC of the short diameter of the lymph node was 0.866, the AUC of the long diameter of the lymph node was 0.762, the AUC of the LAR was 0.780, the cut-off value was 6.5 mm for the short and medium diameter, 11.5 mm for the long diameter, and 0.7 for the LAR;the accuracy rate of diagnosis of lymph node metastasis with short diameter>6.5 mm was the highest, reaching 80%, followed by short diameter combined with LAR, and short diameter combined with LAR had the highest specificity.Conclusion Preoperative cervical lymph node ultrasound has a good evaluation efficiency in selective three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer, and can be used as a routine examination for preoperative evaluation of esophageal cancer three-field lymph node dissection.

参考文献/References:

[1]Rice TW,Ishwaran H,Hofstetter WL,et al.Esophageal Cancer: Associations With (pN+) Lymph Node Metastases[J].Ann Surg,2017,265(1):122-129. [2]Aoyama J,Kawakubo H,Mayanagi S,et al.Discrepancy Between the Clinical and Final Pathological Findings of Lymph Node Metastasis in Superficial Esophageal Cancer[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2019,26(9):2874-2881. [3]方文涛.通过食管癌TNM新分期(第八版)解读2017年NCCN食管鳞癌诊疗指南[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2017,20(10):1122-1126. [4]Leng XF,Zhu Y,Wang GP,et al.Accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].J Thorac Dis,2016,8(8):2146-2157. [5]马长辉.彩色多普勒超声与磁共振成像在诊断食管癌颈部转移淋巴结价值的临床研究[D].南京医科大学,2017. [6]袁勇,陈龙奇.AJCC第八版食管癌分期系统更新解读[J].中华外科杂志,2017,55(2):109-113. [7]林小勇,袁艺,刘新华.探讨颈部结核性淋巴结与转移性淋巴结在超声声像图中的特点[J].影像研究与医学应用,2020,4(2):64-65. [8]Prativadi R,Dahiya N,Kamaya A,et al.Chapter 5 Ultrasound Characteristics of Benign vs Malignant Cervical Lymph Nodes[J].Semin Ultrasound CT MR,2017,38(5):506-515. [9]吕彦利,康秀梅,王燕,等.超声对头颈部转移性淋巴结诊断的Logistic回归分析[J].医学影像学杂志,2018,28(12):2111-2114. [10]曹毛毛,陈万青.中国恶性肿瘤流行情况及防控现状[J].中国肿瘤临床,2019,46(3):145-149. [11]Bray F,Ferlay J,Soerjomataram I,et al.Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2018,68(6):394-424. [12]徐磊,李印,孙海波,等.食管鳞癌术后病理特征对预后的影响[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2017,20(12):1448-1451. [13]Wang Z,Lin S,Wang F,et al.Salvage lymphadenectomy for isolated cervical lymph node recurrence after curative resection of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J].Ann Transl Med,2019,7(11):238. [14]Koterazawa Y,Oshikiri T,Takiguchi G,et al.Prophylactic Cervical Lymph Node Dissection in Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer Increases Postoperative Complications and Does Not Improve Survival[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2019,26(9):2899-2904. [15]Lagergren J,Mattsson F,Zylstra J,et al.Extent of Lymphadenectomy and Prognosis After Esophageal Cancer Surgery[J].JAMA Surg,2016,151(1):32-39. [16]Hagens ERC,Van Berge Henegouwen MI,Cuesta MA,et al.The extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal resection for cancer should be standardized[J].J Thorac Dis,2017,9(Suppl 8):S713-S723. [17]赵越,毛友生.胸段食管鳞癌淋巴结转移规律及淋巴结清扫方式的选择[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2018,21(9):987-994. [18]Yamashita K,Makino T,Yamasaki M,et al.Comparison of short-term outcomes between 2- and 3-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer[J].Dis Esophagus,2017,30(11):1-8. [19]Tachimori Y.Pattern of lymph node metastases of squamous cell esophageal cancer based on the anatomical lymphatic drainage system: efficacy of lymph node dissection according to tumor location[J].J Thorac Dis,2017,9(Suppl 8):S724-S730. [20]Liu J,Wang Z,Shao H,et al.Improving CT detection sensitivity for nodal metastases in oesophageal cancer with combination of smaller size and lymph node axial ratio[J].Eur Radiol,2018,28(1):188-195. [21]Zhang Y,He S,Dou L,et al.Esophageal cancer N staging study with endoscopic ultrasonography[J].Oncol Lett,2019,17(1):863-870. [22]Ghafoori M,Azizian A,Pourrajabi Z,et al.Sonographic Evaluation of Cervical Lymphadenopathy; Comparison of Metastatic and Reactive Lymph Nodes in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Gray Scale and Doppler Techniques[J].Iran J Radiol,2015,12(3):e11044. [23]Nishio N,Fujimoto Y,Hiramatsu M,et al.Diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer with ultrasonic measurement of lymph node volume[J].Auris Nasus Larynx,2019,46(6):889-895.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨雅娟,李 静,朱 琳,等.食管鳞癌组织中miRNAs差异表达谱的筛选及研究[J].医学信息,2019,32(20):63.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.018]
　YANG Ya-juan,LI Jing,ZHU Lin,et al.Screening and Study of Differential Expression Profiles of miRNAs in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma[J].Medical Information,2019,32(14):63.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.20.018]
[2]李清河,廖玲玲,汪红艳.凝血指标对食管鳞癌预后的影响因素分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(24):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.007]
　LI Qing-he,LIAO Ling-ling,WANG Hong-yan.Analysis of Influencing Factors of Coagulation Indexes on Prognosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma[J].Medical Information,2021,34(14):33.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.007]
[3]张文娟,郭永泽,程丽敏,等.miR-106b-3p和miR-214在食管鳞癌组织中的表达及其与临床病理特征的关系[J].医学信息,2021,34(03):116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.03.032]
　ZHANG Wen-juan,GUO Yong-ze,CHENG Li-min,et al.The Epression of miR-106b-3p and miR-214 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Its Relationship with Clinicopathological Characteristics[J].Medical Information,2021,34(14):116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.03.032]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01