[1]李杨昊.不同抗凝方式在连续性肾脏替代治疗急性肾损伤患者中的疗效及安全性比较[J].医学信息,2022,35(16):121-124.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.030]
　LI Yang-hao.Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Anticoagulant Methods in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Acute Kidney Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(16):121-124.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.030]
点击复制

不同抗凝方式在连续性肾脏替代治疗急性肾损伤患者中的疗效及安全性比较()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
35卷
期数:
2022年16期
页码:
121-124
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2022-08-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Different Anticoagulant Methods in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Acute Kidney Injury
文章编号:
1006-1959（2022）16-0121-04
作者:
李杨昊
（天津市职业病防治院ICU，天津 300011）
Author(s):
LI Yang-hao
(ICU of Tianjin Occupational Disease Prevention and Control Hospital,Tianjin 300011,China)
关键词:
连续性肾脏替代; 急性肾损伤; 抗凝效果
Keywords:
Continuous renal replacement; Acute kidney injury; Anticoagulant effect
分类号:
R692.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.16.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较不同抗凝方式在连续性肾脏替代治疗急性肾损伤患者中的疗效及安全性。方法 选取2016年4月-2021年4月我院治疗的47例行连续肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组（n=23）和观察组（n=24）。对照组采用肝素钠治疗，观察组采用阿加曲班治疗。比较两组凝血功能指标（Hb、PLT、APTT）、抗凝效果、穿刺点压迫止血时间、电解质及酸碱平衡指标（pH、Na+、HCO3-）以及并发症发生率。结果 两组治疗后Hb、PLT低于治疗前，APTT高于治疗前，且观察组Hb、PLT高于对照组，APTT低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组抗凝分级0级、Ⅰ级比例大于对照组，Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级比例小于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组穿刺点止血时间短于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组治疗后HCO3-低于对照组，总钙高于对照组（P＜0.05），而两组pH、Na+比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；观察组并发症发生率为8.33%，低于对照组的21.74%（P＜0.05）。结论 阿加曲班在连续性肾脏替代治疗急性肾损伤患者中的抗凝效果良好，可改善凝血功能指标，预防血小板减少症，纠正水电解质平衡，缩短穿刺点压迫止血时间，降低并发症发生率，是一种安全、有效的治疗药物。
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of different anticoagulation methods in continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury.Methods A total of 47 patients with acute kidney injury who underwent continuous renal replacement therapy in our hospital from April 2016 to April 2021 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group (n=23) and observation group (n=24) by random number table method. The control group was treated with heparin sodium, and the observation group was treated with argatroban. The coagulation function indexes (Hb, PLT, APTT), anticoagulant effect, hemostasis time of puncture point compression, electrolyte and acid-base balance indexes (pH, Na+, HCO3-) and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.Results After treatment, Hb and PLT in the two groups were lower than those before treatment, APTT was higher than that before treatment, Hb and PLT in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, APTT was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The proportion of anticoagulation grade 0 and grade Ⅰ in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the proportion of grade Ⅱ and grade Ⅲ was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The hemostasis time of puncture point in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, HCO3- in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the total calcium was higher than that in the control group (P<0.05); there was no significant difference in pH and Na+ between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of complications in the observation group was 8.33%, which was lower than 21.74% in the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion There are differences in the efficacy of different anticoagulation methods in patients with acute renal injury after continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).Compared with CRRT, CRRT has a good Argatroban effect in improving coagulation function and preventing thrombocytopenia, it is a safe and effective drug to correct the balance of water and electrolyte, shorten the time of hemostasis and reduce the incidence of complications.

参考文献/References:

[1]王侃,王迎,黄心洁,等.局部枸橼酸抗凝在体外循环术后连续性肾脏替代治疗的应用[J].重庆医学,2017,46(1):106-108.[2]Ricci D,Panicali L,Facchini MG,et al.Citrate Anticoagulation during continuous Renal Replacement Therapy[J].Current Perspectives in Kidney Diseases,2017,190(1):19-30.[3]李琴,游洪江,范婉秋,等.连续肾脏替代疗法中应用枸橼酸钠抗凝后发生代谢性酸中毒的危险因素分析[J].山东医药,2017,57(2):77-79.[4]叶涛,余追.局部枸橼酸钠抗凝对连续性肾脏替代治疗患者补钙速率的影响[J].内科急危重症杂志,2016,22(2):125-126.[5]代庆春,李娜,回志,等.不同抗凝方法对连续性血液净化治疗脓毒症患者凝血功能和疗效的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2016,36(7):1681-1682,1683.[6]陈小凤,阳文新,孙守松,等.ISS评分与CRAMS评分在多发伤患者预后评估中的应用[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2017,26(6):664-668.[7]Pertica N,Cicciarella L,Carraro A,et al.Safety and Efficacy of Citrate Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy for Acute Kidney Injury After Liver Transplantation: A Single－Center Experience[J].Transplantation Proceedings,2017,49(4):674-676.[8]叶涛,余追.局部枸橼酸钠抗凝对连续性肾脏替代治疗患者补钙速率的影响[J].内科急危重症杂志,2016,22(2):125-126.[9]吴秀玲,罗玉珍.局部枸橼酸抗凝进行连续性肾脏替代治疗在重症患者中的应用[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,21(18):2369-2370.[10]魏晓华.两种不同抗凝方法在危重症患者连续性肾脏替代治疗中的比较研究[D].石家庄:河北医科大学,2015.[11]王海芳.不同抗凝方法在感染性休克伴有急性肾损伤患者连续性肾脏替代治疗中的比较研究[D].石家庄:河北医科大学,2018.[12]周仁祥,张华,曾照彬,等.枸橼酸抗凝与无抗凝的CVVH治疗颅内出血伴肾功能不全的比较[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2019,14(6):528-532. [13]庄冰,杨俊伟.局部枸橼酸抗凝在连续性肾脏替代治疗中的应用[J].中华医学杂志,2017,97(36):2875-2877. [14]Malkan UY,Gunes G,Eliacik E,et al.The factors affecting early death after the initial therapy of acute myeloid leukemia[J].Int J Clin Exp Med,2016,8(12):22564-22569.[15]魏晓华,叶光磊,刘文悦,等.局部枸橼酸抗凝在体外循环术后患者连续性肾替代治疗中临床应用[J].创伤与急危重病医学,2018,6(1):48-50.[16]周美兰.CRRT治疗中枸橼酸钠VS肝素抗凝的安全性和有效性研究[D].西安:第四军医大学,2016.[17]高立贤.不同抗凝方式在危重症患者连续性肾脏替代治疗中的比较研究[D].承德:承德医学院,2020.[18]姜变通.无钙型局部枸橼酸抗凝用于CRRT的不同补钙途径对钙离子浓度影响的临床研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2020.[19]吴青,陈新,周小华.不同抗凝方式对急性肾损伤患者持续性肾脏替代治疗的疗效比较[J].中国药业,2018,27(5):64-66.[20]贾超,王松,代小雨.不同抗凝方式在连续性肾脏替代治疗急性肾损伤患者中的疗效及安全性比较[J].内科急危重症杂志,2019,25(2):133-135.

相似文献/References:

[1]党 阳.急性肾损伤早期诊断标志物的研究进展[J].医学信息,2018,31(11):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.11.014]
　DANG Yang.Research Progress on Markers for Early Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(16):43.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.11.014]
[2]盛海龙,方长太,查佳安.超声造影对重症急性胰腺炎并发早期急性肾损的诊断价值[J].医学信息,2022,35(09):171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.044]
　SHENG Hai-long,FANG Chang-tai,ZHA Jia-an.Diagnostic Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography in Severe Acute Pancreatitis Complicated with Early Acute Kidney Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(16):171.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.044]
[3]张建强,蒋 鹏,顾新伟,等.公民逝世后器官捐献合并AKI供体肾移植的疗效观察[J].医学信息,2019,32(12):96.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.029]
　ZHANG Jian-qiang,JIANG Peng,GU Xin-wei,et al.Therapeutic Effect of Organ Donation Combined with AKI Donor Kidney Transplantation after the Death of Citizens[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(16):96.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.12.029]
[4]傅 君,吴伟芳.CRRT治疗应用于危重急性肾损伤对患者 肾功能及病死率的影响[J].医学信息,2019,32(17):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.17.033]
　FU Jun,WU Wei-fang.Effect of CRRT Treatment on Renal Function and Mortality in Patients with Critical Acute Kidney Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(16):104.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.17.033]
[5]陈冀远.右美托咪啶对脓毒症急性肾损伤患者肾功能及血管紧张素Ⅱ表达的影响[J].医学信息,2020,33(01):142.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.01.045]
　CHEN Ji-yuan.Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Renal Function and Angiotensin Ⅱ Expression in Patients with Acute Renal Injury in Sepsis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(16):142.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.01.045]
[6]张军涛.对比剂急性肾损伤的诊治[J].医学信息,2020,33(04):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.04.019]
　ZHANG Jun-tao.Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Kidney Injury with Contrast Agent[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(16):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.04.019]
[7]白 准,刘旭丽,曾维忠,等.持续肾脏替代治疗时机对感染性休克合并急性肾损伤患者预后的影响[J].医学信息,2020,33(08):116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.08.036]
　BAI Zhun,LIU Xu-li,ZENG Wei-zhong,et al.Effect of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy on the Prognosis of Patients with Septic Shock and Acute Kidney Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(16):116.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.08.036]
[8]郭馨巍,高 明,李 贺,等.血清LCN2、UMOD及尿IL-18联合检测在重症急性胰腺炎并发急性肾损伤中的早期预测价值[J].医学信息,2023,36(02):85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.02.017]
　GUO Xin-wei,GAO Ming,LI He,et al.The Value of Combined Detection of Serum LCN2, UMOD and Urine IL-18 in the Early Prediction of Severe Acute Pancreatitis with Acute Kidney Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(16):85.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.02.017]
[9]陈超逸,赵弯弯,黄 婷,等.NGAL与急性肾损伤患者的临床相关性分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(15):50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.15.014]
　CHEN Chao-yi,ZHAO Wan-wan,HUANG Ting,et al.Analysis of Clinical Correlation Between NGAL and Acute Kidney Injury[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(16):50.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.15.014]
[10]高 珍,覃 辉.经皮冠状动脉介入术后造影剂诱导急性肾损伤预测模型的构建[J].医学信息,2021,34(16):87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.16.023]
　GAO Zhen,QIN Hui.Construction of A Predictive Model of Contrast Agent-induced Acute Kidney Injury After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(16):87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.16.023]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01