[1]吴玲普.股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉对老年创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折的效果观察[J].医学信息,2020,33(15):109-111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.033]
　WU Ling-pu.Observation Effect of Anti-rotation Proximal Femoral Intramedullary Nail and Dynamic Hip Screw on Elderly Traumatic Intertrochanteric Fractures[J].Medical Information,2020,33(15):109-111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.033]
点击复制

股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉对老年创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折的效果观察()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
33卷
期数:
2020年15期
页码:
109-111
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2020-08-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Observation Effect of Anti-rotation Proximal Femoral Intramedullary Nail and Dynamic Hip Screw on Elderly Traumatic Intertrochanteric Fractures
文章编号:
1006-1959（2020）15-0109-03
作者:
吴玲普
广州中医药大学第三附属医院创伤骨科，广东 广州 510000
Author(s):
WU Ling-pu
Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics,the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Universityof Traditional Chinese Medicine,Guangzhou 510000,Guangdong,China
关键词:
股骨近端防旋髓内钉; 动力髋螺钉; 创伤性; 股骨粗隆间骨折
Keywords:
Proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail; Dynamic hip screw; Traumatic; Femoral intertrochanteric fracture
分类号:
R687.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.15.033
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 观察股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折效果、术后功能以及并发症发生情况。方法 选取2015年10月~2019年9月在我院治疗的220例老年创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折患者为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组，各110例。对照组采用动力髋螺钉治疗，研究组采用股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗，比较两组临床治疗效果、手术指标、髋关节功能评分（Harris评分）、并发症发生情况以及骨折复位丢失率。结果 研究组优良率（93.63%）高于对照组（90.00%），但差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；研究组手术时间、术中出血量以及骨折愈合时间均小于对照组, 差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；治疗后，研究组Harris评分为（88.11±4.78）分，高于对照组的（71.84±6.20）分，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；研究组并发症发生率（3.63%）与对照组（4.54%）比较，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），研究组骨折复位丢失率（10.91%）低于对照组（22.72%），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折均具有良好的治疗效果，且安全性良好。但股骨近端防旋髓内钉手术时间更短、术中出血量更少，Harris评分更高，且骨折复位丢失率较低，利于患者的术后恢复，值得临床应用。
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effect of proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail and dynamic hip screw in the treatment of elderly traumatic femoral intertrochanteric fractures, postoperative function and complications.Methods A total of 220 elderly patients with traumatic intertrochanteric fractures of the femur who were treated in our hospital from October 2015 to September 2019 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into a control group and a study group by a random number table, with 110 cases in each group. The control group was treated with dynamic hip screws, and the study group was treated with proximal femur anti-rotation intramedullary nails. The clinical treatment effects, surgical indicators, hip function scores (Harris scores), complications, and fracture reduction loss rates were compared between the two groups.Results The excellent and good rate of the study group (93.63%) was higher than that of the control group (90.00%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P＞0.05); the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fracture healing time of the study group were lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05); After treatment, the Harris score of the study group was (88.11±4.78) points, which was higher than the control group (71.84±6.20) points, the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05); the study group had complications incidence rate (3.63%) compared with the control group (4.54%), the difference was not statistically significant (P＞0.05), the fracture reduction loss rate of the study group (10.91%) was lower than the control group (22.72%), the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion Proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail and dynamic hip screw for the treatment of elderly traumatic femoral intertrochanteric fractures have good therapeutic effects and good safety. However, the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation intramedullary nail has shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, higher Harris score, and lower fracture reduction loss rate, which is conducive to the postoperative recovery of patients and is worthy of clinical application.

参考文献/References:

[1]李洪波,黄之春,王明成,等.PFNA和LPFP内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J].南昌大学学报(医学版),2014,54(10):25-28,32.[2]王才迈,历剑锋,王铁洲.老年创伤性股骨粗隆间骨折应用不同手术治疗方案治疗效果分析[J].浙江创伤外科,2016,21(4):681-683.[3]阮传江.DHS和PFNA对高龄股骨粗隆间不稳定型骨折的疗效及安全性分析[J].皖南医学院学报,2018,37(4):353-355,359.[4]3茹江英,丛宇,仓海斌,等.老年股骨粗隆间骨折PFNA内固定术后失效的翻修方法及效果分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2014,29(2):129-131.[5]张雷,谢获,钟声,等.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果分析[J].中国医学工程,2016(8):45-46.[6]揭牧夫,欧冠周,祝最成.人工关节置换术与内固定术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果及安全性分析[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(4):487-489.[7]黄志勇,罗剑,尹国栋,等.PFNA和人工双极股骨头置换术治疗老年性股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J].创伤外科杂志,2016,18(12):738-741.[8]王煜,李志君,郑玉鹏,等.PFNA内固定治疗老年骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效分析[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2017,14(4):20-23.[9]王智,任平,王杰,等.三种内固定方法治疗老年人骨质疏松性股骨粗隆间骨折的优缺点分析[J].海南医学,2015(1):31-33.[10]田飞,朱六龙.老年股骨粗隆间骨折手术治疗方法及优缺点[J].中国乡村医药,2016,23(13):81-83.[11]梁春来,陶立俊,胡龙均,等.老年股骨粗隆间骨折采用关节置换治疗的疗效观察[J].浙江创伤外科,2016,21(2):380-382.[12]鞠海宁,李宏伟,朱平,等.PFNA治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(3):804-806.[13]张长青,张春啸,张文治,等.PFNA与PFN内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效评价[J].生物骨科材料与临床研究,2014,11(5):51-54.[14]黄永栋,赵辉,张虓.PFNA与解剖型锁定钢板内固定治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2015,30(4):402-404.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴 侃,李 黎,杨家赵,等.仰卧位与侧卧位下PFNA治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的 临床疗效比较[J].医学信息,2018,31(11):76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.11.024]
　WU Kan,LI Li,YANG Jia-zhao,et al.Comparison of Clinical Effects between Supine Position and Lateral Decubitus PFNA in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly[J].Medical Information,2018,31(15):76.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.11.024]
[2]王添兴,李国庆,汪 洋,等.空心加压螺钉与动力髋螺钉治疗股骨颈骨折术后股骨头坏死相关并发症的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2019,32(02):83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.02.024]
　WANG Tian-xing,LI Guo-qing,WANG Yang,et al.Meta-analysis of Complications Associated with Hollow Compression Screws and Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Head Necrosis after Femoral Neck Fracture[J].Medical Information,2019,32(15):83.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.02.024]
[3]陈 冲.PFNA与BFNR治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效[J].医学信息,2019,32(11):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.031]
　CHEN Chong.Therapeutic Effect of Proximal Femoral Nail and Artificial Bipolar Femoral Head Replacement for the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly[J].Medical Information,2019,32(15):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.031]
[4]胡朝期,陈先进,张 军,等.氨基己酸在PFNA治疗老年性不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折围手术期隐性失血量中的应用[J].医学信息,2021,34(05):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.05.034]
　HU Zhao-qi,CHEN Xian-jin,ZHANG Jun,et al.Application of Aminocaproic Acid in PFNA Treatment of Perioperative Hidden Blood Loss in Senile Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures[J].Medical Information,2021,34(15):120.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.05.034]
[5]艾登超.股骨粗隆间骨折的治疗研究[J].医学信息,2021,34(08):64.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.08.017]
　AI Deng-chao.Study on the Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures[J].Medical Information,2021,34(15):64.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.08.017]
[6]欧阳平,周伶俐.股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效及对患者髋关节功能的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(16):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.16.024]
　OUYANG Ping,ZHOU Ling-li.Clinical Effect of Proximal Femoral Nail Anti Rotation Intramedullary Nail in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture of Femur and its Effect on Hip Joint Function[J].Medical Information,2023,36(15):125.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.16.024]
[7]陈士易,叶 青,姜 磊,等.PFNA内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效[J].医学信息,2021,34(22):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.034]
　CHEN Shi-yi,YE Qing,JIANG Lei,et al.Curative Effect of PFNA Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture[J].Medical Information,2021,34(15):112.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.22.034]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01