[1]徐亚伟.经输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的效果[J].医学信息,2019,32(23):117-118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.23.033]
　XU Ya-wei.Treatment of Ureteral Calculi with Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy[J].Medical Information,2019,32(23):117-118.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.23.033]
点击复制

经输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的效果()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年23期
页码:
117-118
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Treatment of Ureteral Calculi with Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）23-0117-02
作者:
徐亚伟
（江西省瑞昌市人民医院泌尿外科，江西 瑞昌 332200）
Author(s):
XU Ya-wei
(Department of Urology,Ruichang People’s Hospital,Ruichang 332200,Jiangxi,China)
关键词:
输尿管结石; 输尿镜; 钬激光碎石术; 安全性
Keywords:
Ureteral calculi; Ureter; Holmium laser lithotripsy; Safety
分类号:
R699.4
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.23.033
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 探究经输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的有效性、安全性。方法 选取2018年2月~2019年3月就诊于我院的70例输尿管结石患者，按随机数字表法分为对照组和研究组，各35例。对照组行气压弹道碎石术，研究组行钬激光碎石术。比较两组治疗效果、手术相关情况（手术时间、血尿和住院时间）及并发症（输尿管穿孔、感染、便血）。结果 研究组总有效率为94.29%，高于对照组的77.14%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；研究组手术、血尿和住院时间均少于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；研究组并发症发生率为2.86%，低于对照组的22.86%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 经输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效较好，可有效缩短手术时间及患者的住院时间，减少并发症的发生。
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral calculi. Methods 70 patients with ureteral calculi who were admitted to our hospital from February 2018 to March 2019 were randomly divided into the control group and the study group, with 35 cases in each group. In the control group, pneumatic lithotripsy was performed, and the study group underwent holmium laser lithotripsy. The treatment effects, surgical related conditions (surgery time, hematuria and hospitalization time) and complications (ureteral perforation, infection, blood in the stool) were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of the study group was 94.29%, which was higher than that of the control group 77.14%,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The operation time, hematuria and hospitalization time of the study group were lower than the control group,the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05); the complication rate of the study group was 2.86%, which was lower than that of the control group 22.86%,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Transurethroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy is effective in the treatment of ureteral calculi, which can effectively shorten the operation time and hospitalization time, and reduce the occurrence of complications.

参考文献/References:

[1]田文栋.输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石的效果分析[J].中国药物与临床,2019,19(4):643-645.[2]彭仁德,冯师健,周亮,等.输尿管镜钬激光碎石术联合中药治疗上段输尿管结石疗效评价[J].实用医院临床杂志,2019,16(1):149-151.[3]韩生禄,刘海莲,赵留存,等.输尿管镜下气压弹道碎石术与钬激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石疗效对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2019,48(5):578-580. [4]杨钟良,黄毅.输尿管镜下钬激光碎石与气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2019,37(5):71-72.[5]陶宏平,赵伟平,朱扬进,等.经输尿管硬镜钬激光碎石术与气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管多发结石的临床研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2016,22(4):39-42.

相似文献/References:

[1]江宏飞.经输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管结石的临床效果观察[J].医学信息,2018,31(04):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.038]
　JIANG Hong-fei.Clinical Effect of Pneumatic Lithotripsy through Ureteroscope in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,31(23):111.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.04.038]
[2]彭 瑛.综合护理干预对输尿管结石URSL术后 治疗效果的影响分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(09):172.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.057]
　PENG Ying.Analysis of the Effect of Comprehensive Nursing Intervention on Ureteral Calculi after URSL Procedure[J].Medical Information,2018,31(23):172.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.09.057]
[3]黄东亮,思建民.MSCT非增强扫描在输尿管结石诊断中的应用[J].医学信息,2018,31(15):148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.048]
　HUANG Dong-liang,SI Jian-min.Application of MSCT Non-enhanced Scanning in Diagnosis of Kidney and Ureter Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,31(23):148.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.16.048]
[4]苟险峰.不同手术方式治疗输尿管结石的效果分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(17):92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.028]
　GOU Xian-feng.Analysis of the Effect of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Ureteral Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,31(23):92.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.17.028]
[5]王振宇,陈 军.输尿管结石术后双J管留置时间的比较分析[J].医学信息,2018,31(19):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.031]
　WANG Zhen-yu,CHEN Jun.Comparative Analysis of Indwelling Time of Double J Tube after Ureteral Calculi[J].Medical Information,2018,31(23):105.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.19.031]
[6]郑少凯,张长椿,张 舟.超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞在上段输尿管结石切开取石术中的应用[J].医学信息,2021,34(04):142.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.04.038]
　ZHENG Shao-kai,ZHANG Chang-chun,ZHANG Zhou.Application of Ultrasound-guided Paravertebral Nerve Block in the Upper Ureteral Stone Incision and Removal[J].Medical Information,2021,34(23):142.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.04.038]
[7]刘 睿.输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效比较[J].医学信息,2019,32(24):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.24.040]
　LIU Rui.Comparison of Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Ureteral Calculi[J].Medical Information,2019,32(23):115.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.24.040]
[8]厉莎莎,赵 炎,梁 杰,等.输尿管镜同期治疗双侧输尿管结石清石率分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(09):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.09.058]
　LI Sha-sha,ZHAO Yan,LIANG Jie,et al.Analysis of Clearing Rate of Ureteroscopy for Bilateral Ureteral Stones[J].Medical Information,2020,33(23):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.09.058]
[9]王春力,李雨根,邓显忠,等.输尿管镜碎石术术前应用坦索罗辛辅助治疗有效性的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(19):68.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.19.020]
　WANG Chun-li,LI Yu-gen,DENG Xian-zhong,et al.Meta Analysis of the Effectiveness of Tamsulosin Adjuvant Treatment Before Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy[J].Medical Information,2020,33(23):68.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.19.020]
[10]呼廷辉,王 颖,蔡 涛,等.mPCNL与RPLU治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石疗效及安全性的Meta分析[J].医学信息,2020,33(20):60.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.017]
　HU Ting-hui,WANG Ying,CAI Tao,et al.Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of mPCNL and RPLU in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Incarcerated Calculi[J].Medical Information,2020,33(23):60.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.20.017]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-12-01