[1]邓廷志,李富林,陈烈钳,等.输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗 直径≤2 cm肾结石的临床疗效对比[J].医学信息,2019,32(13):91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.13.025]
　DENG Ting-zhi,LI Fu-lin,CHEN Lie-qian,et al.Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Calculi with Diameter≤2 cm[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(13):91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.13.025]
点击复制

输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗 直径≤2 cm肾结石的临床疗效对比()
分享到：

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
32卷
期数:
2019年13期
页码:
91
栏目:
临床研究
出版日期:
2019-07-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy between Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Calculi with Diameter≤2 cm
文章编号:
1006-1959（2019）13-0091-04
作者:
邓廷志; 李富林; 陈烈钳; 黄栋强; 陈景宇
广东惠州市第一人民医院泌尿外科，广东 惠州 516000
Author(s):
DENG Ting-zhi; LI Fu-lin; CHEN Lie-qian; HUANG Dong-qiang; CHEN Jing-yu
Department of Urology,the First People's Hospital of Huizhou, Huizhou 516000,Guangdong,China
关键词:
肾结石; 输尿管软镜碎石; 经皮肾镜碎石
Keywords:
Key words：Renal calculi; Ureteroscopy lithotripsy; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
分类号:
R699.2
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.13.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 比较输尿管软镜碎石术（FURS）与经皮肾镜碎石术（PCNL）治疗直径≤2 cm肾结石患者的临床疗效，为≤2 cm肾结石患者选择合适的治疗方法提供依据。方法 选取2017年7月~2018年7月来我院就诊的160例直径≤2 cm的肾结石患者为研究对象，按手术方式分为FURS组和PCNL组，每组80例。对比两组的手术时间、术中出血量、手术成功率、住院时间、住院费用、碎石成功率以及并发症发生率。结果 FURS组平均手术时间少于PCNL组[（45.05±12.89）min vs （65.95±14.63）min]，术中出血量、住院时间及费用均低于PCNL组，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。FURS组和PCNL组的手术成功率分别为95.00%和92.50%，结石清除率分别为90.79%和87.84%，差异均无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。FURS组术后并发症发生率低于PCNL组（5.26% vs 17.57%），差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 治疗直径≤2 cm的肾结石，FURS和PCNL两种手术方式均具有较高的结石清除率，但PCNL的术后并发症发生率更高，相比PCNL，FURS具有术中出血量少、住院时间短以及住院费用低等优势，因此FURS是治疗直径≤2 cm肾结石更好的手术选择。
Abstract:
Abstract：Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with ≤2 cm diameter renal calculi, and to provide appropriate treatment for patients with ≤2 cm kidney stones. Methods A total of 160 patients with renal calculi with a diameter of ≤2 cm who came to our hospital from July 2017 to July 2018 were enrolled. The patients were divided into FURS group and PCNL group according to the surgical procedure, 80 cases in each group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical success rate, hospitalization time, hospitalization cost, gravel success rate and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The average operation time in the FURS group was less than that in the PCNL group [(45.05±12.89) min vs (65.95±14.63) min]. The intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time and cost were lower than those in the PCNL group,the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The success rates of surgery in the FURS group and the PCNL group were 95.00% and 92.50%, respectively. The stone removal rates were 90.79% and 87.84%, respectively,the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the FURS group was lower than that in the PCNL group (5.26% vs 17.57%),the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions For the treatment of renal calculi with a diameter of ≤2 cm, both FURS and PCNL have higher stone clearance rates, but the incidence of postoperative complications of PCNL is higher. Compared with PCNL, FURS has less intraoperative blood loss. With short hospital stays and low hospitalization costs, FURS is a better surgical option for treating kidney stones ≤2 cm in diameter.

参考文献/References:

[1]Zeng G,Mai Z,Xia S,et al.Prevalence of kidney stones in China:an ultrasonography based cross-sectional study[J].BJU Int,2017,120(1):109-116. [2]Acar C,Cal C.Impact of Residual Fragments following Endourological Treatments in Renal Stones[J].Adv Urol,2012(2012):813523. [3]周淑新,梁剑虹.肾结石的治疗与预防[J].中国全科医学,2012(13):1431-1434. [4]Aune D,Mahamat-Saleh Y,Norat T,et al.Body fatness,diabetes,physical activity and risk of kidney stones:a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies[J].Eur J Epidemiol,2018,33(11):1033-1047. [5]Yang TK,Yang HJ,Lee LM,et al.Body mass index and buttock circumference are independent predictors of disintegration failure in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi[J].J Formos Med Assoc,2013,112(7):421-425. [6]李武学,赵兴华,许长宝,等.输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石疗效比较[J].山东医药,2014,54(6):92-93. [7]翟成喜,邓仁强,王龙,等.Ⅰ期输尿管软镜下钬激光治疗直径＜2cm肾结石临床疗效分析[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2017(2):21-23. [8]吴猛,刘良兵,易东风.软性输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石取石术治疗直径≤2cm肾结石5年回顾性分析[J].临床外科杂志,2017,25(6):469-471. [9]杨增悦,付强,保庭毅,等.多通道微创经皮肾镜结合钬激光治疗复杂性肾结石的临床研究[J].中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,4(1):36-39. [10]Kyriazis I,Panagopoulos V,Kallidonis P,et al.Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J].World Journal of Urology,2015,33(8):1069-1077. [11]Chien TM,Lu YM,Chou YH,et al.Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Increases the Risk of New-onset Hypertension:A Nationwide 6-Year Follow-up Study[J].Urology,2016,97(7):61-65. [12]陈惠萍,潘毅燕.f-URS与ESWL治疗直径10~20mm肾中上盏结石效果的对比分析[J].浙江临床医学,2016,18(12):2173-2174.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨 恒,钱 彪,王勤章,等.Claudin-14在两种肾结石模型肾组织中表达的对比研究[J].医学信息,2022,35(09):87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.022]
　YANG Heng,QIAN Biao,WANG Qin-zhang,et al.Comparative Study of Claudin-14 Expression in Renal Tissues of Two Renal Calculi Models[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(13):87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.09.022]
[2]钟愉明,宋乐明,彭作锋,等.智能控压输尿管软镜吸引取石术治疗肾结石的临床研究[J].医学信息,2018,31(24):87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.023]
　ZHONG Yu-ming,SONG Le-ming,PENG Zuo-feng,et al.Clinical Study of Intelligent Pressure-controlled Ureteroscope for Attracting Stone to Treat Renal Calculi[J].Journal of Medical Information,2018,31(13):87.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2018.24.023]
[3]郝志强,王勤章,钱 成,等.纳米细菌肾结石模型血、尿生化的动态观测[J].医学信息,2019,32(11):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.017]
　HAO Zhi-qiang,WANG Qin-zhang,QIAN Cheng,et al.Dynamic Observation of Blood and Urine Biochemistry in Nanobacteria Kidney Stone Model[J].Journal of Medical Information,2019,32(13):58.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2019.11.017]
[4]吴晓丽,刘 峰,谢建军.输尿管软镜联合钬激光碎石术在肾结石合并2型糖尿病中的效果[J].医学信息,2020,33(06):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.030]
　WU Xiao-li,LIU Feng,XIE Jian-jun.Effect of Soft Ureteroscope Combined with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in Kidney Stones Combined with Type 2 Diabetes[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(13):103.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.06.030]
[5]黄郁兰.延续性护理联合知信行健康教育模式对肾结石术后患者复发风险的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(21):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.21.037]
　HUANG Yu-lan.Effect of Continuous Nursing Combined with Knowledge-attitude-practice Health Education Model on Recurrence Risk of Patients with Renal Calculi After Operation[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(13):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.21.037]
[6]张 鹏.肾结石患者尿钙、镁、钠、钾与尿阳离子的相关性分析[J].医学信息,2021,34(18):110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.028]
　ZHANG Peng.Correlation Analysis of Urinary Calcium,Magnesium,Sodium,Potassium andUrinary Cations in Patients with Kidney Stones[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(13):110.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.18.028]
[7]吴旭峰,孙 发.肾结石发生机制及外科治疗研究[J].医学信息,2021,34(23):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.23.007]
　WU Xu-feng,SUN Fa.Study on Mechanism and Surgical Treatment of Renal Calculi[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(13):25.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.23.007]
[8]王亚婷,刘 昱,李明权.基于网络药理学探讨金钱草治疗肾结石的作用机制[J].医学信息,2022,35(02):69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.017]
　WANG Ya-ting,LIU Yu,LI Ming-quan.Mechanism of Herba Lysimachiae on Renal Calculi Based on Network Pharmacology[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(13):69.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.02.017]
[9]聂岳龙,欧阳汛,周 亮,等.微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾积水合并肾结石的临床实践及结石清除率观察[J].医学信息,2023,36(13):95.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.018]
　NIE Yue-long,OUYANG Xun,ZHOU Liang,et al.Clinical Practice and Stone Clearance Rate of Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Nephrolithiasis Complicated with Renal Calculi[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(13):95.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.018]
[10]孙 硕.腰麻联合硬膜外麻醉与全身麻醉在输尿管软镜肾结石钬激光碎石术中的有效性和安全性[J].医学信息,2023,36(20):121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.20.023]
　SUN Shuo.Efficacy and Safety of Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia and General Anesthesia in Ureteroscopic Holmium Laser Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(13):121.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.20.023]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-01