[1]游 莎.基于质量反馈理论的护理干预对静脉溶栓脑梗死患者神经功能恢复及Barthel指数的影响[J].医学信息,2025,38(03):161-164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.033]
 YOU Sha.Effect of Nursing Intervention Based on Quality Feedback Theory on Neurological Function Recovery and Barthel Index in Patients with Cerebral Infarction After Intravenous Thrombolysis[J].Journal of Medical Information,2025,38(03):161-164.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.033]
点击复制

基于质量反馈理论的护理干预对静脉溶栓脑梗死患者神经功能恢复及Barthel指数的影响()
分享到:

医学信息[ISSN:1006-1959/CN:61-1278/R]

卷:
38卷
期数:
2025年03期
页码:
161-164
栏目:
护理研究
出版日期:
2025-02-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of Nursing Intervention Based on Quality Feedback Theory on Neurological Function Recovery and Barthel Index in Patients with Cerebral Infarction After Intravenous Thrombolysis
文章编号:
1006-1959(2025)03-0161-04
作者:
游 莎
弋阳县人民医院神经内科,江西 弋阳 334400
Author(s):
YOU Sha
Department of Neurology, Yiyang County People′s Hospital, Yiyang 334400, Jiangxi, China
关键词:
质量反馈理论静脉溶栓脑梗死神经功能Barthel指数
Keywords:
Quality feedback theory Intravenous thrombolysis Cerebral infarction Neurological function Barthel index
分类号:
R473.5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2025.03.033
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目的 研究基于质量反馈理论的护理干预对静脉溶栓脑梗死患者神经功能恢复及Barthel指数的影响。方法 选取2021年12月-2023年12月在我院进行静脉溶栓治疗的82例脑梗死患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组,各组41例。对照组采用常规护理,观察组采用基于质量反馈理论的护理干预。比较两组神经功能缺损评分(NIHSS)、日常生活能力水平(Barthel指数)、自我效能感(GSES)、护理满意度以及并发症发生率。结果 与干预前比较,两组NIHSS评分均降低,且与对照组相比,观察组NIHSS评分更低(P<0.05);与干预前比较,两组Barthel指数均升高,且与对照组相比,观察组Barthel指数更高(P<0.05);与干预前比较,两组干预后GSES各维度评分升高,且与对照组相比,观察组GSES各维度评分更高(P<0.05);与对照组护理满意度的85.37%相比,观察组护理满意度为97.56%,其护理满意度更高(P<0.05);与对照组并发症发生率的17.07%相比,观察组并发症发生率为7.32%,其并发症发生率更低(P<0.05)。结论 基于质量反馈理论的护理干预可促进静脉溶栓脑梗死患者神经功能恢复,提高Barthel指数、自我效能感以及护理满意度,降低并发症发生率,具有较理想的护理效果。
Abstract:
Objective To study the effect of nursing intervention based on quality feedback theory on neurological function recovery and Barthel index in patients with cerebral infarction after intravenous thrombolysis. Methods A total of 82 patients with cerebral infarction who underwent intravenous thrombolysis in our hospital from December 2021 to December 2023 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 41 patients in each group. The control group was given routine nursing, while the observation group was given nursing intervention based on quality feedback theory. The neurological deficit score (NIHSS), daily living ability (Barthel index), self-efficacy (GSES), nursing satisfaction and complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with before intervention, the NIHSS score of the two groups was decreased, and compared with the control group, the NIHSS score of the observation group was lower (P<0.05). Compared with before intervention, the Barthel index of the two groups was increased, and compared with the control group, the Barthel index of the observation group was higher (P<0.05). Compared with before intervention, the scores of each dimension of GSES in the two groups were increased after intervention, and the scores of each dimension of GSES in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Compared with 85.37% of the nursing satisfaction in the control group, the nursing satisfaction in the observation group was 97.56%, and the nursing satisfaction in the observation group was higher (P<0.05). Compared with 17.07% of the incidence complications in the control group, the incidence of complications in the observation group was 7.32%, and the incidence of complications in the observation group was lower (P<0.05). Conclusion Nursing intervention based on quality feedback theory can promote the recovery of neurological function in patients with cerebral infarction after intravenous thrombolysis, improve Barthel index, self-efficacy and nursing satisfaction, and reduce the incidence of complications.

参考文献/References:

[1]龙媛熙.临床护理路径在急性脑梗死患者静脉溶栓中的应用效果[J].实用临床医药杂志,2017,21(22):94-96.[2]孟玉芝,周俊山,张颖冬.专职化层级护理模式应用于急诊脑梗死病人对抢救效果及护理质量的影响[J].护理研究,2018,32(22):3570-3574.[3]张艳玲,唐兴江,郭晓燕,等.重组组织型纤溶酶原激活物静脉溶栓治疗腔隙性脑梗死患者的临床疗效及患者预后的影响因素研究[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2020,28(9):45-50.[4]王健,王明哲,田君,等.中西医结合规范化护理对急性脑梗死静脉溶栓患者的疗效观察[J].心脑血管病防治,2020,20(4):109-111.[5]Suzuki Y,Tsubakino S,Fujii H.Eating and Grooming Abilities Predict Outcomes in Patients with Early Middle Cerebral Infarction:A Retrospective Cohort Study[J].Occupational Therapy International,2020,2020(10159):1-8.[6]何彬彬.分析优质护理配合rt-PA静脉溶栓对觉醒型缺血性卒中患者的治疗效果[J].湖南中医药大学学报,2018,22(A1):186-186.[7]Li L,Ren S,Hao X,et al.Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Intervention in Patients With Acute Cerebral Infarction[J].Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology,2019,73(1):22-26.[8]李景云,唐蕊.优质化护理流程在脑梗死患者静脉溶栓中的应用[J].西部中医药,2018,31(9):131-133.[9]胡华,杨元元,刘晶,等.丹红注射液联合依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死的疗效和安全性系统评价[J].中华中医药杂志,2017,32(10):4683-4689.[10]覃惠洵,高文,张皆德,等.血管内取栓治疗超时间窗缺血性卒中患者的临床疗效分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2019,16(10):533-538.[11]鲜继淑,王飞龙,苏红,等.颅脑创伤后下肢深静脉血栓形成的危险因素分析[J].第三军医大学学报,2018,40(22):2093-2097.[12]吴函书,张葆荣,刘洋,等.集束化护理预防血液净化患儿下肢深静脉血栓形成的效果研究[J].中华护理杂志,2019,54(3):368-373.[13]黄翚,陈浩扬,杨勇,等.轻型缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓的疗效分析[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2019,16(5):231-236.[14]丁琳,陈素虹,吴家岚,等.Barthel指数在长期护理机构老年痴呆患者中的适用性分析[J].中华护理杂志,2019,54(7):1012-1016.[15]刘必琴,顾志娥,胡娅莉,等.基于Autar量表的分级护理在脑卒中患者深静脉血栓形成预防中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2019,25(23):36-38.[16]徐丽.急性缺血性脑梗死应用重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂溶栓并发症的预防性护理[J].护理研究,2019,33(4):699-700.[17]余敏燕.质量反馈理论应用于脑卒中患者静脉溶栓护理探讨[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018,22(20):4-7.[18]周秉博,王晓宏,杨军.急性脑梗死患者重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂静脉溶栓后出血性转化的危险因素分析[J].中国医科大学学报,2017,46(12):1101-1104,1110.[19]孙博,王高临,朱秀红,等.早期情志康复综合护理模式在老年脑梗死患者情绪调节及康复护理依从性中的作用[J].贵州医药,2018,42(1):120-122.[20]陈字花.质量反馈理论在腹腔镜下胆囊切除术围术期护理模式优化中的应用[J].基层医学论坛,2020,24(17):2492-2493.

相似文献/References:

[1]宋贵军.急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓治疗[J].医学信息,2020,33(17):47.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.17.014]
 SONG Gui-jun.Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke[J].Journal of Medical Information,2020,33(03):47.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.17.014]
[2]肖 健.静脉溶栓桥接动脉内取栓治疗颅内血管闭塞的临床效果及安全性观察[J].医学信息,2021,34(24):117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.029]
 XIAO Jian.Clinical Effect and Safety of Intravenous Thrombolysis Bridging Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Intracranial Vascular Occlusion[J].Journal of Medical Information,2021,34(03):117.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.24.029]
[3]周 跃,高永超.阿替普酶早期静脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗塞对患者凝血功能、氧化炎症反应及神经功能的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(03):156.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.03.041]
 ZHOU Yue,GAO Yong-chao.Effect of Early Intravenous Thrombolysis with Alteplase on Coagulation Function,Oxidative Inflammatory Response and Neurological Function in Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(03):156.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.03.041]
[4]王 伟,宫秀群,余 亮.阿替普酶治疗急性脑梗死患者临床转归的影响因素[J].医学信息,2022,35(11):84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.022]
 WANG Wei,GONG Xiu-qun,YU Liang.The Influencing Factors of Clinical Outcome in Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction Treated with Alteplase[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(03):84.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.11.022]
[5]褚春沐.阿加曲班联合阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的效果及对脑血管储备功能的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(13):133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.13.031]
 CHU Chun-mu.Effect of Argatroban Combined with Alteplase Intravenous Thrombolysis on Acute Cerebral Infarction and its Effect on Cerebrovascular Reserve Function[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(03):133.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.13.031]
[6]赵东慧.阿替普酶静脉溶栓联合氯吡格雷对急性脑梗死患者脑血流动力学及CRP、Hcy、HDL-C水平的影响[J].医学信息,2022,35(20):74.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.20.018]
 ZHAO Dong-hui.Effect of Alteplase Intravenous Thrombolysis Combined with Clopidogrel on Cerebral Hemodynamics and Levels of CRP, Hcy and HDL-C in Patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction[J].Journal of Medical Information,2022,35(03):74.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2022.20.018]
[7]赵东慧,王 楠,杨思远.阿加曲班联合阿替普酶静脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死的疗效及对脑血管储备功能的影响[J].医学信息,2023,36(13):151.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.033]
 ZHAO Dong-hui,WANG Nan,YANG Si-yuan.Effect of Argatroban Combined with Alteplase Intravenous Thrombolysis on Acute Cerebral Infarction and its Effect on Cerebrovascular Reserve Function[J].Journal of Medical Information,2023,36(03):151.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2023.13.033]

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01